Quantcast
Channel: The Salt Lake Tribune
Viewing all 90049 articles
Browse latest View live

Chase Hansen misses Utah’s Pro Day tests, while revealing that he played the second half of the 2018 season with a herniated disc in his back.

$
0
0

Chase Hansen is unable to run or perform in other tests in advance of the NFL draft, so the former Utah linebacker can only hope that his play on the field last year is a convincing enough audition.

The body of work includes Hansen’s playing the second half of his senior season with a herniated disc in his lower back.

And that disclosure explains how Hansen became the biggest story of Utah’s Pro Day, as the Ute seniors worked and others including former receiver Darren Carrington II worked out Thursday for NFL personnel.

Cody Barton, who teamed with Hansen in possibly the school’s best-ever linebacking tandem, did only position drills at the Spence Eccles Field House, choosing to let his testing numbers stand from the NFL Scouting Combine in Indianapolis. Barton and safety Marquise Blair are Utah’s top draft prospects, expected to be taken in about the fourth round.

Hansen was in that discussion as of the middle of last season, when he became Utah’s most productive defensive player after moving from safety for his senior year. The back injury occurred in late October, when the Utes were beating USC and UCLA, Hansen said, but he received injections and played through the Pac-12 championship game Nov. 30 vs. Washington. Hansen made the All-Pac-12 first team; he was credited with 13 tackles in each of three games after sustaining his injury.

He strained his hip in the Pac-12 title game, unrelated to the other injury, causing him to miss the Holiday Bowl vs. Northwestern. Hansen then received “pretty strong advice to get [the disc] fixed for the long run,” he said, so he had surgery in January.

Hansen probably won't be able to work out for teams prior to the April 25-27 draft. “Hopefully, they can gather what kind of player you are, just from your film,” said Hansen, who met with more than a dozen scouts Thursday. They reviewed his 2018 performances and asked “a million questions,” he said, trying to gauge how he learns off the field.

The timing is not good, the 25-year-old Hansen acknowledges, but he's confident about being healthy for training camp in July, whether he's drafted or signs as a free agent.

“It's frustrating,” he said, “and I hope coaches can get a good understanding of what kind of player I am and what kind of player I could be. Hopefully, it won't be too much of a knock, but I understand that it could affect things. Regardless of whether or not it does, I'm prepared for whatever. If I get an opportunity, I'm going to make the most of it.”

Thanks to playing a 14th game, while Hansen missed the Holiday Bowl, Barton became Utah's leading tackler for the season. Barton is success story in the Ute program, as what coach Kyle Whittingham has described as “a self-made guy.”

Barton became a star of the Combine, running the 40-yard dash in 4.64 seconds and doing 30 bench-presses of 225 pounds, among other strong showings. That’s why he did only linebacker drills Thursday, when he said, “I just wanted to show some athleticism on the field and have some fun.” Other players’ testing numbers were not announced.

Hansen, Barton, Blair, kicker Matt Gay, punter Mitch Wishnowsky and offensive tackle Jackson Barton (Cody's older brother) attended the Combine. Three more senior starters – offensive linemen Lo Falemaka and Jordan Agasiva and safety Corrion Ballard – should be drafted or get free-agent opportunities.

“A bunch of good players in that group,” Whittingham said this week. That's college football; that's how it works. It cycles – the seniors leave, new recruits come up through the system and it just perpetuates.”

Four other seniors worked out Thursday, along with Carrington, who caught 70 passes for the Utes in 2017 after transferring from Oregon. Carrington was a late signee with Dallas last summer and was soon waived. Carrington brought in former Oregon quarterback Dakota Prukop to throw for him, with current college players not allowed to participate in Pro Days.


Dems demand Mueller’s full 300 pages, mock ‘scaredy-cat’ GOP

$
0
0

Washington • Special counsel Robert Mueller’s Trump-Russia report is more than 300 pages long, it was revealed Thursday, sparking fresh criticism from Democrats arguing that Attorney General William Barr’s four-page summary was gravely inadequate and the full findings must be quickly released.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi called Barr’s synopsis that cleared President Donald Trump of campaign collusion with Russia and criminal obstruction of the federal probe “condescending” and “arrogant.”

"Mr. Attorney General, we do not need your interpretation," Pelosi said Thursday. "Show us the report and we'll come to our own conclusions." She mocked the administration and Republicans as "scaredy-cats."

The length of Mueller's confidential report makes clear that there are substantially more details he and his team have documented in their investigation than Barr disclosed to Congress and the public in his summary. The volume of pages was described Thursday by a Justice Department official and another person familiar with the document.

The Justice Department official said Barr discussed the length of the report during a phone call Wednesday with House Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Jerrold Nadler.

Both the department official and the other person spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss the confidential report.

Barr has been at work going through the document as the battle is intensifying over if and when he will release the complete report and its underlying evidence amid Democratic concerns that what has been made public so far was tilted in Trump’s favor. Barr has said he’ll release at least a partial version in April and also told Nadler he would agree to testify before his committee.

As that battle brews, House Democrats barreled ahead with their oversight of the Trump administration, and Trump resumed his attack on Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., just as the chairman of the intelligence committee was about to gavel the panel into session.

"Congressman Adam Schiff, who spent two years knowingly and unlawfully lying and leaking, should be forced to resign from Congress!" Trump tweeted early Thursday.

Republicans picking up on Trump's complaints formalized their demand that Schiff resign as chairman of the intelligence panel over his comments that there was significant evidence the president and his associates conspired with Russia.

"We have no faith in your ability to discharge your responsibilities" in line with the Constitution, the Republicans wrote to Schiff in a missive they read aloud at the hearing.

Republicans pointed to Barr's synopsis, released Sunday, that said Mueller's probe didn't find that Trump's campaign "conspired or coordinated" with the Russian government to influence the 2016 presidential election.

Schiff stood by his remarks, listing the meetings those in Trump's circle had with Russians. He noted Trump's pursuit of a deal to build a Trump Tower in Moscow.

"There is a different word for that than collusion, and it's called compromise," Schiff said, as he opened the session. The hearing was called to provide an overview on how Russia in the past has blackmailed Americans.

Since Barr's findings were released, Schiff this week has repeated his assertion that evidence of collusion is in "plain sight." He says Mueller's failure to find a criminal conspiracy with Russia does not absolve the Trump campaign of its actions.

Pelosi stood by Schiff, saying she was proud of him and taunted Republicans — and Trump — for fearing the chairman whom she called a "patriotic leader."

"What is the president afraid of, Is he afraid of the truth?" she said. "They're just scaredy-cats."

Outside the hearing room, the main battle continued over releasing Mueller's still-confidential report. The New York Times first reported Thursday that the report was more than 300 pages.

"I would hope the attorney general would not be acting as a political operative for the president," said Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., a member of the Judiciary Committee. "The Department of Justice should not be involved in a cover-up of what's actually in the report."

Rep. Elijah Cummings, D-Md., chairman of the House Oversight Committee, said Wednesday he was disappointed Barr would take weeks, not days, to release the report.

"The president has now an opportunity for weeks, it sounds like, to do these victory laps," said Cummings, noting that Trump's lawyer, Michael Cohen, is among those headed to jail as a result of the probe. "Cohen goes to jail, the president runs a victory lap."

Barr told the chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., that he's combing through Mueller's report and removing classified, grand jury and other information in hopes of releasing the rest to Congress.

Trump has said he's fine with releasing the findings. "The president said, 'Just let it go,' and that's what's going to happen," Graham said.

What's clear, though, is that Barr will miss the Tuesday deadline set by six House committee chairmen to see the full confidential report and its underlying documents. They have suggested they may eventually try to subpoena it.

Associated Press writers Eric Tucker, Andrew Taylor, Catherine Lucey, Jill Colvin, Alan Fram, Mike Balsamo and Padmananda Rama contributed to this report.

HUD accuses Facebook of housing bias, reviews Google, Twitter ads

$
0
0

U.S. regulators say digital advertising practices at Facebook Inc. violate housing law and they are reviewing whether ads placed by Twitter Inc. and Alphabet Inc.'s Google also discriminate against those seeking a place to live.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development on Thursday accused Facebook of enabling and encouraging bias based on race and religion, as well as sex, by restricting who can see housing-related ads on its platforms and across the internet. HUD also has sent letters to Twitter and Google inquiring about the advertising systems for their sites and products as well, said Brian Sullivan, a department spokesman.

"Facebook is discriminating against people based upon who they are and where they live," HUD Secretary Ben Carson said. "Using a computer to limit a person's housing choices can be just as discriminatory as slamming a door in someone's face."

The social network allowed those advertising housing to exclude people it classified as parents; non-American-born; non-Christian; interested in accessibility and Hispanic culture; as well as other group's deemed protected classes, HUD said in a statement.

The Washington Post reported earlier Thursday that HUD had alerted Google and Twitter last year that it was scrutinizing their practices for possible violations of the federal Fair Housing Act.

"We've had policies in place for many years that prohibit targeting ads on the basis of sensitive categories like race, ethnicity, religious beliefs, disability status, negative financial standing, etc," a Google spokesman said in an email. "Our policies are designed to protect users and ensure that advertisers are using our platforms in a responsible manner. "

A Twitter spokesman said the company doesn't allow discriminatory advertising on its platform and that, "someone using Twitter to advertise agrees to comply with the law and not use our services for illegal activities."

The government's civil lawsuit against Facebook came after the social network has been working to address many of the issues raised and last year eliminated advertising targeting options that could be misused.

Last week, the Menlo Park, California-based company reached agreements with the National Fair Housing Alliance, the American Civil Liberties Union and others to change how housing and credit ads can be run on the platform. Facebook said it would no longer let advertisements for housing, jobs or credit be targeted to particular users by age, gender or zip codes and companies that use the social network and its other platforms to run those ads will have to certify compliance with anti-discrimination laws.

"We're surprised by HUD's decision, as we've been working with them to address their concerns and have taken significant steps to prevent ads discrimination," Facebook said in the statement. "While we were eager to find a solution, HUD insisted on access to sensitive information -- like user data -- without adequate safeguards. We're disappointed by today's developments, but we'll continue working with civil rights experts on these issues."

HUD's accusation will be heard by a U.S. administrative law judge unless one of the parties to the lawsuit wants it moved to federal district court, according to the agency. If the judge rules that Facebook violated the Fair Housing Act, penalties could include fines and a ban on the ads in question.

Bloomberg’s Selina Wang and Gerrit De Vynck contributed to this report.

Bagley Cartoon: Medicaid Expansion of Our Own Design

$
0
0
This Pat Bagley cartoon appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Friday, March 29, 2019.This Pat Bagley cartoon appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Thursday, March 29, 2019.(Pat Bagley  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)  This cartoon by Pat Bagley titled "Our National Dinosaurs" appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Wednesday, March 27, 2019.(Pat Bagley | The Salt Lake Tribune)  This Pat Bagley cartoon, titled "No Collusion," appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Tuesday, March 26, 2019.This Pat Bagley cartoon appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Sunday, March 24, 2019.This Pat Bagley cartoon appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Friday, March 22, 2019.This Pat Bagley cartoon appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Thursday, March 21, 2019.This Pat Bagley cartoon appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Wednesday, March 20, 2019.(Pat Bagley | The Salt Lake Tribune)  This Pat Bagley cartoon, titled "Trump's Following," appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Tuesday, March 19, 2019.This Pat Bagley cartoon appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Thursday, March 14, 2019.This Pat Bagley cartoon appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Sunday, March 10, 2019.

This Pat Bagley cartoon appears in The Salt Lake Tribune on Friday, March 29, 2019. You can check out the past 10 Bagley editorial cartoons below:

  • <a href="https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/27/bagley-cartoon-millenials/" target=_blank><u>Millennial’s World</u></a>
  • <a href="https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/26/bagley-cartoon-our/"><u>Our National Dinosaurs</u></a>
  • <a href="https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/25/bagley-cartoon-no/"><u>No Collusion</u></a>
  • <a href="https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/22/bagley-cartoon-mueller/"><u>The Mueller Report</u></a>
  • <a href="https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/21/bagley-cartoon/"><u>Legislative Wrap Up</u></a>
  • <a href="https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/20/bagley-cartoon/"><u>Safeguarding the Public Trust</u></a>
  • <a href="https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/19/bagley-cartoon-strong/"><u>A Strong Leader</u></a>
  • <a href="https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/18/bagley-cartoon-trumps/"><u>Trump’s Following</u></a>
  • <a href="https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/13/bagley-cartoon-monument/"><u>Monument to Oneself</u></a>
  • <a href="https://www.sltrib.com/opinion/bagley/2019/03/08/bagley-cartoon-flagging/"><u>Flagging Enthusiasm for Tax “Reform”</u></a>

Want more Bagley? Become a fan on Facebook.

Utah’s Chris Stewart joins Republicans to call for Democratic House Intel chairman to step down

$
0
0

Washington • Rep. Chris Stewart of Utah joined fellow Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee to urge the panel's chairman, Democratic Rep. Adam Schiff, to step down from his post because of his previous – and continued – arguments that President Donald Trump is steeped in ethical and possibly treasonous actions.

Schiff, of California, says there is “more than circumstantial” evidence that Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia during the 2016 presidential election even after Attorney General William Barr offered a summary of special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation concluding that there was no proof of collusion.

“Chairman Schiff’s actions are unbecoming as chairman and he risks permanently damaging our crucial role in overseeing the intelligence work of the United States,” Stewart said in a statement. “You can’t say that [President Trump] has committed treason, and say ‘but we’re OK with that, we’ll allow him to stay in office’. It isn’t one or the other. And for these reasons I call on Mr. Schiff to step down as chairman.”

The Utah congressman did not seem as concerned with establishing proof before lobbing accusations earlier this week when he tweeted that “the corruption of former leadership of FBI/DOJ/CIA is astounding. It will take yrs for agencies to rebuild reputations. How were such political hacks elevated to these positions.”

The tweet was responding to fired FBI Director James Comey’s comment that many questions remained after the Barr summary was released. Stewart also suggested that a second special counsel be appointed to probe the former intelligence officials.

Stewart and his eight fellow Republicans on the intelligence committee said Schiff needs to leave his post leading the panel but stopped short of saying he should resign from office.

Your actions both past and present are incompatible with your duty as chairman of this committee, which alone in the House of Representatives has the obligation and authority to provide effective oversight of the U.S. intelligence community,” the letter from the Republicans said. “As such, we have no faith in your ability to discharge your duties in a manner consistent with your constitutional responsibility and urge your immediate resignation as chairman of this committee.”

While Barr has summarized Mueller’s report in four pages delivered to Congress, it appears Mueller and his team actually penned more than 300 pages about the nearly two year investigation. Democrats have demanded the full report be publicly released, though it’s unclear if, or when, that will happen.

Schiff, who has been a dogged critic of the president, says the Intelligence Committee will continue to probe Trump and isn't backing down. He noted that there's clear proof that the Trump team was willing to entertain accepting “dirt” from a Russian operative.

“I don’t think it’s OK. I think It’s immoral, I think it’s unethical, I think it’s unpatriotic, and yes, I think it’s corrupt, and evidence of collusion,” Schiff said. “I do not think that conduct, criminal or not, is OK. And the day we do think that’s OK, is the day we look back and say that is the day America lost its way.”

The calls for Schiff to step down come almost exactly two years then-House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes, R-Calif., recused himself from the panel’s Russia investigation after an uproar because he was found sharing surveillance information with President Trump. Utah’s Stewart was among Nunes’ most vocal defenders.


Trump backs off proposal to cut Special Olympics funds

$
0
0

Washington • President Donald Trump announced Thursday that he was backing off his budget request to eliminate funding for the Special Olympics, reversing course on a proposal that was unlikely to be approved by Congress after days of bipartisan criticism.

Speaking to reporters as he left the White House for a rally in Michigan, Trump said he had authorized funding for the organization. "I heard about it this morning. I have overridden my people. We're funding the Special Olympics."

Trump's announcement came after Education Secretary Betsy DeVos spent days defending the proposal, which drew widespread condemnation from lawmakers, as well as advocates and celebrities. The president's sudden reversal reflected a political desire to move away from a plan that was not expected to pass Congress, but also underscored Trump's comfort with undercutting top officials.

Said Trump: "I've been to the Special Olympics. I think it's incredible."

Walking back her defense of the proposal, DeVos issued a statement, saying: "I am pleased and grateful the President and I see eye to eye on this issue and that he has decided to fund our Special Olympics grant. This is funding I have fought for behind the scenes over the last several years."

The remarks were a sharp contrast from her comments to Senate Democrats in a budget hearing earlier in the day. DeVos said her department had to make "tough choices" on the budget and insisted the Special Olympics should be supported through private donations.

In a heated exchange with Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill., DeVos said she "wasn't personally involved" in pushing for elimination of the funding, but she defended it as her agency seeks to cut $7 billion for the 2020 budget. "Let's not use disabled children in a twisted way for your political narrative," she said.

The president's shift Thursday was not the first time he has undermined a top aide. He repeatedly berated former Attorney General Jeff Sessions in public and private and clashed openly with former Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, ultimately firing him in a tweet.

The Trump administration's education budget proposal called for the elimination of $17.6 million in funding for the Special Olympics, amounting to roughly 10 percent of the group's overall revenue. Most of its funding comes from individual and corporate contributions and other fundraising efforts.

The Special Olympics is the largest sports organization in the world for people with intellectual disabilities, with over 5 million athletes from 174 countries participating in competitions while spreading a global message of inclusion and empowerment. The organization celebrated its 50th anniversary last year.

Trump officials previously called for the elimination of Special Olympics funding in their budget proposal for 2019, but Congress rejected the idea. Lawmakers from both parties said they would reject it again for 2020.

Durbin told DeVos on Thursday that it would be shameful to pull support for the Special Olympics, saying "someone has to accept responsibility for a bad decision."

Asked Thursday whether he supports the proposed cut, House Minority Leader Kevin, McCarthy, R-Calif., told reporters, "No. I fully support Special Olympics."

Before Trump's announcement his campaign sought to use the funding conflict as an attack against Democrats over abortion. Deputy Communications Director Matt Wolking tweeted Thursday: "I'm sure Democrats who see abortion as the cure for Down syndrome and other disabilities are sincerely concerned about kids having the chance to be in the Special Olympics."

DeVos faced questioning on a range of topics Thursday, including her proposed rewrite of rules around campus sexual assault and her handling of for-profit colleges.

Murray said the Education Department has been too slow to process more than 100,000 applications for loan forgiveness from students who say they were cheated by for-profit colleges. DeVos previously delayed an Obama-era rule allowing such forgiveness, but a federal judge said the delay was unlawful.

Asked on Thursday how many applications had been approved since the judge's order was issued, DeVos she didn't know but that officials are "reviewing them regularly."

Others criticized DeVos' department for being unresponsive to congressional requests for information. Blunt, chairman of the Senate subcommittee over the education budget, said he shared that concern.

"There are two or three departments we're just not getting responses back from as quickly as we should," Blunt told DeVos. "We're your funding source and have an oversight responsibility in addition to that."

___

Binkley reported from Boston. Associated Press writer Alan Fram contributed to this report.

Ogden temporarily suspends recycling program

$
0
0

Ogden • Ogden officials say they have temporarily suspended the city’s recycling program as they work to finalize a contract with the recycling provider.

The Standard-Examiner reports the city announced the suspension Tuesday, but officials said city trucks will continue to pick up blue recycling bins as regularly scheduled.

Ogden Chief Administrative Officer Mark Johnson says Recycled Earth's 47 percent increase in recycling tipping fees has as made the deal less viable, but the city hopes to continue the program.

Tipping fees are charged when processing facilities receive waste.

Recycled Earth owner Amy Rawson says the higher fees are "purely a response to the market."

China has banned most imported recyclables, leading to higher recycling costs in cities across the U.S.

Paul Musgrave: Why were liberals so desperate to believe that Mueller would save democracy?

$
0
0

The conclusion of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report on his investigation of President Donald Trump last weekend came as an anticlimax. Attorney General William Barr's summary makes plain that while the report does not conclude that the president committed crimes, it does not exonerate him, either. Yet after month upon month of anticipation, the investigation had become so freighted that the non-release of a non-exoneration led the New York Times to headline its analysis, "A Cloud Over Trump's Presidency Is Lifted," while The Washington Post reported that Hill Democrats were giving up on impeachment for now.

To understand why this nonevent was so significant, we have to examine the function that Mueller’s report served for Democrats while it was being written. Because they lacked any real power during most of the Trump administration to counter the trauma of the 2016 election and everything that’s come since then, the idea that Saint Robert would slay the orange dragon held appeal as a salvation myth. Trump’s opponents could remain hopeful that, even though they didn’t have the means to do it, somebody else would fix the almost impossible problem of how to oust a president they viewed as illegitimate and catastrophic.

The plot line into which Democrats cast Mueller's investigation came right out of a legal procedural. The star of this show was supposed to have been an upright lawman, who - with his impeccable credentials as an investigator, a prosecutor and a Republican to boot - would prove Trump's villainy and deliver him to justice.

Many expressed their hope in Mueller's investigation quietly and soberly. The journalist Garrett Graff argued for patience, writing in Wired last year that Mueller "always knows more than we think." Others were less restrained. The prominent Twitter account @ProudResister crowed in January that Mueller's indictments of Russian agents showed that "Trump defends Russia because he is a TRAITOR." A market for Mueller swag sprung up, from "It's Mueller Time" beer glasses to Spike Lee's T-shirts reading "God protect Robert Mueller." (Spike Lee! Defending an FBI director!)

As long as Democratic leaders could point to the Mueller investigation as reason to postpone direct conflict with the administration, there was little need for them to make politically risky moves. In August, for instance, Roll Call described the strategy of House Democratic leaders, including Rep. Adam Schiff of California, as "let special counsel Robert S. Mueller III finish his investigation and issue a report - we'll decide where to go from there."

This wasn't cowardice but calculation. Democratic leaders probably let Mueller carry the hopes and dreams of so many of their base voters because they knew that the Russia issue wasn't much of a winner with the broader electorate. Newly released findings from the 2018 Cooperative Congressional Election Study (CCES) of 60,000 Americans show conclusively that a belief that the Trump administration colluded with Russia is almost entirely partisan, with fewer independents - and very few Republicans - willing to entertain that notion.

Pausing on impeachment until the Mueller report arrived gave Democrats room to appeal beyond their base in the 2018 midterms by talking about other issues, from health care to taxes to the economy. When the report landed with no further indictments, it showed how weak the party's hand was relative to what its base demanded.

The most loyal Democrats hoped that Mueller would save the day for two reasons. First, as the CCES data showed, they were already convinced that Trump had colluded. They expected that any fair investigation, therefore, would arrive at the same conclusion. A December 2018 Fox News poll of registered voters found, for instance, that 65 percent of Democrats (but only 13 percent of Republicans) thought it was extremely or very likely that the special counsel would find that Trump had committed impeachable offenses.

Second, they had no other options. For the first two years of Trump's term, every federal institution was stacked against Democrats. Since they lacked any real-world levers, magical thinking - the belief that a white(-haired) knight could save the day with an ironclad report - came to the fore. And for two years, that belief sustained a number of Democrats.

Democrats may have also turned to a law-enforcement figure because there were few other institutions in the national government they trusted at all. In June 2017, Gallup reported that, with President Barack Obama out and Trump in, partisans' trust in national institutions changed dramatically. Only 10 percent of Democrats said they now trusted the White House, and only 11 percent trusted Congress. By contrast, Democrats' trust in the courts (43 percent) and the criminal justice system (27 percent) weren't all that much different than the figures for Republicans.

But those were the only government institutions, besides the military, that Democrats had much faith in at all. Similarly, a June/July 2018 Georgetown University Baker Center poll found that Democrats trusted the FBI at high levels - more than nonprofits! - even as Republicans trusted the bureau almost as little as they did college professors. Mueller and his investigation therefore fit neatly into a category of the shrinking set of institutions that Democrats still put stock in.

Yet the evidence shows that Mueller was never quite as respected by Americans in general as the myth required. I downloaded every polling question in the Roper/iPoll database between June 2017 and January 2019 that asked whether Americans approved of Mueller and whether they believed that his investigation would be fair. Although Mueller began his appointment with nearly 70 percent approval ratings, by January, his approval hovered just above the 50 percent mark.

A lot of that support probably reflected partisanship rather than disinterested hopes for fact-finding. When poll questions didn't identify Mueller as the special prosecutor (a tipoff to partisans about how they should answer), the most common response (an average of 37 percent across 23 polls) was that Americans hadn't heard of him, compared with an average of 32 percent who approved. Similarly, belief that his investigation would be fair peaked early and showed a small but steady decline. Both of these trends follow the general hyperpartisan trend of contemporary politics.

Even if Mueller had concluded that the evidence against Trump was damning, it's likely that party loyalties soon would have reasserted themselves in response (as, indeed, they have in the aftermath of the non-release of the report). A February 2018 Marist poll found that 55 percent of Americans would believe Mueller over Trump if the two disagreed, which was almost exactly the same percentage as disapproved of Trump's presidency in that poll. Ninety-one percent of Democrats said they would have sided with Mueller - but only 15 percent of Republicans said they would have gone against the president.

The deflation of the Mueller Time myth, then, also means Democrats are falling back to reality.

Not only is there no hero to save them, but they remain in a weak position: controlling fewer states than Republicans, while their power in the federal judiciary is waning and Republicans have a lock on the Senate. Even after they regained the House, Democrats' powers remain limited, although they have substantial leverage to block many budget and legislative initiatives. House Democrats might even be able to impeach the president (and they have no lack of grounds to do so), but the Republican-controlled Senate is unlikely to convict.

Where does this leave the country - and Democrats? Although kindled by partisanship, the Mueller myth reflected the embers of faith in the strength of political institutions to overcome the flaws of our political culture. The deepest root of that faith is the belief that the will of the people is best expressed through elections. Many observers, and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., argued on those grounds that impeachment would therefore be the wrong way to get rid of Trump - that he must instead be defeated at the ballot box in 2020.

As inspirational as this plan may sound to some now, its appeal springs from the same yearning for a decisive victory that fed the Mueller myth. And it will probably fare no better: The American system is not set up to deliver massive popular rebukes to presidents. We've already had a ballot box defeat of Trumpism - when he lost the popular vote in 2016. Yet because of the electoral college, he still won. And even Democrats' strong showing in the 2018 midterms illustrated the limitations of electoral politics to repudiate Trump: They took the House but fell even further behind in the Senate. (And this all leaves aside the question of whether the president would gracefully accept an electoral defeat next year.)

Even if 2020 delivered a defeat to Trump, though, it would leave in place the conditions and institutions that brought him to power in the first place. There might be a momentary catharsis, but expecting that a single election (or investigation) can fix everything only undermines the more realistic but less exciting processes of political change - of winning over enough voters to pass policies one by one, or the more radical project of reshaping institutions to prevent future disasters. The lesson to take from Democrats' infatuation and disappointment with the Mueller myth is that there are no heroes or final acts in politics. There is only us and a continual struggle.


Paul Musgrave is an assistant professor of political science at the University of Massachusetts.


This is what Utah’s colleges are proposing for tuition hikes. The percentages are some of the lowest in more than a decade.

$
0
0

Utah’s public colleges are requesting some of the lowest tuition increases this year than they have in the past decade — an adjustment that comes after state auditors last fall scrutinized the largely unregulated process where high increases were approved without question.

That scathing report spurred the Utah Board of Regents to create a new system requiring each university to present an individualized request for a tuition change at a public hearing. The first attempt Thursday lasted more than six hours and included one college that asked for no increase.

“I think it’s a real improvement in the process,” said Harris Simmons, board chairman. “We’re getting a level of detail that we’ve never really drilled into before.”

Previously, members gave the green light to university proposals without much discussion, debate or examination of where the funds would be used. And the board never denied a request. The audit found that resulted in potentially $65 million given to the state’s eight public colleges over the past five years beyond what was needed.

On Thursday, the panel heard reports from the schools’ presidents about tuition increases for 2019-2020. Almost all of the leaders said their requests were crafted to the minimum amount possible to cover staff salaries and programs to help students.

“We’re trying to do what we can,” said Salt Lake Community College President Deneece Huftalin.

Still, board members listened and asked tough questions: Why do you need that much funding? Could you deal with less? What part of your request is a priority? Is there any shifting you can do at your institution to come up with the money elsewhere?

They’ll finish reviewing the proposals Friday morning and then approve a percentage increase they deem appropriate for each institution. It’s possible they freeze tuition hikes entirely. They could also approve only enough to cover faculty raises, which all schools have to account for.

Utah’s public colleges, which do have some of the lowest tuition rates in the nation, are unique in that, unlike with other state jobs, the Legislature designates only 75 percent of the funds needed to pay for annual compensation increases rather than the full 100 percent. Tuition hikes are generally expected to cover the rest. This year, lawmakers designated $29 million for those costs.

With that, it’s likely to be a tense vote on the proposals.

At the end of the hearing Thursday, members disagree about how to define a justified hike. Regent Daniel Campbell argued that the University of Utah’s request for a 3.2 percent increase — about $128 more per student each semester and down from an earlier 3.9 percent — was worthwhile because “we see the returns.” The school has boosted its graduation rates from 55 percent in 2011 to 70 percent in 2017.

“I don’t see a lot of things that are wasted,” Campbell said. “That’s not what I’m coming away with.”

Other schools requested money for mental health and campus safety initiatives, which Simmons said deserve “some really critical discussion.” He also questioned if the 1.7 percent hike requested by Utah Valley University, the largest college in the state, was enough.

“It is a tough balance,” added David Buhler, Utah’s commissioner of higher education. “Someone can always say it’s too high. Someone can always say we need more. And they’re both right.”

Overall, the tuition increases are down since 2010 when a handful of schools were requesting more than 12 percent each year. The requests this year, which range from 5 percent at Dixie State University to 0 percent at Southern Utah University, are listed below from highest to lowest and include the plans each president presented for how the extra money would be used:

Dixie State University

• Proposed increase: 5 percent, or $111 more per semester

• New tuition cost for average in-state student: $2,340 per semester

• Increase approved last year: 3.5 percent

Dixie State in southern Utah is one of the few that requested a bigger hike this year than last.

The school was designated as a state university in 2013 and has moved up into a Division I placement for its sports team. With those changes, said President Richard Williams, it needs more funding to catch up and recruit faculty.

“We’re a growing university,” he added. “There’s a lot of infrastructure that we don’t have.”

With the proposed increase, Williams said, Dixie State would spend a half million dollars to fund scholarships for its athletes. Another $150,000 would go toward advancing professors in tenure. And $75,000 would fund a new campus safety sergeant to help the school move to 24-hour policing on campus.

Utah State University

• Proposed increase: 3.25 percent, or $103 more per semester

• New tuition cost for average in-state student: $3,274 per semester

• Increase approved last year: 3.9 percent

With its proposed increase, USU would collect an additional $4.1 million.

President Noelle Cockett said the school “did a really tough look” to get to that number, including not requesting extra money for its child care center. When asked, most students, she said, opposed spending more for that program.

“I’m not here to do something that students don’t see the additional value of their dollars,” she said.

The northern Utah school will instead fund $227,500 more in scholarships, $1.1 million in faculty promotions and $180,000 toward a math tutoring center. The rates will vary slightly for the campuses in Blanding and Price.

University of Utah

• Proposed increase: 3.2 percent, or $128 more per semester

• New tuition cost for average in-state student: $4,126 per semester

• Increase approved last year: 3.9 percent

The state’s flagship university and research institution has the highest tuition of any public school in the state, but the increase requested this year will be the lowest for the campus in nearly 20 years.

The U. had originally requested a 3.9 percent increase but dropped to 3.2 percent after the Legislature passed a budget for higher education that designated more than administrators expected. Still, most of the funds raised by the hike will go toward staff compensation and making salaries equitable across genders, races and departments.

In addition to those increases, President Ruth Watkins has asked for $1 million to go toward improving campus safety after a student was killed outside her dorm last fall.

“We certainly are at a time in the institution where our need to invest in safety training and assessment is high,” she said.

Regent Thomas Wright questioned whether students would actually notice if the school didn’t get the entire tuition increase it has proposed. Watkins responded that without the money, the university wouldn’t be able to retain top faculty or invest in getting students to graduate faster.

Snow College

• Proposed increase: 2.5 percent, or $42 more per semester

• New tuition cost for average in-state student: $1,705 per semester

• Increase approved last year: 1.5 percent

With the least expensive tuition among the eight public colleges in the state, Snow College President Gary Carlston, who is stepping down in May, said his only goal is to keep it “the most affordable.”

He’s asking for $45,000 for tenure promotions and $41,000 for departmental scholarships.

Salt Lake Community College

• Proposed increase: 2 percent, or $33 more per semester

• New tuition cost for average in-state student: $1,718 per semester

• Increase approved last year: 1.5 percent

Enrollment at SLCC has gone down the last two years, leaving the school with a population of slightly more than 29,000 students. With that decline, Huftalin, the president, said the institution has eliminated seven faculty and 10 administrative positions and repurposed 17 other staffers.

Most of the money it would get with the tuition increase — roughly $1 million — would go to paying the remaining professors a competitive salary and hiring extra police officers to extend patrols at their multiple campuses to 10 p.m. About $100,000 would be designated to expand advising for students.

Weber State University

• Proposed increase: 2 percent, or $49 more per semester

• New tuition cost for average in-state student: $2,495 per semester

• Increase approved last year: 2.5 percent

President Brad Mortensen, who stepped into office early this year, presented a simple proposal Thursday. One of the biggest chunks of funding requested by the school would be allocated for need-based scholarships.

Weber asked the Board of Regents to set aside a quarter of a million dollars to Dream Weber, a program that helps low-income students cover the tuition for their first two years of classes.

“We are conscientious of using all of our funding,” Mortensen said.

Utah Valley University

• Proposed increase: 1.7 percent, or $43 more per semester

• New tuition cost for average in-state student: $2,561 per semester

• Increase approved last year: 1.5 percent

Utah Valley University is the largest and fastest growing college in the state. By the latest count, it had 39,900 students. By 2027, it’s expected to jump to 51,000.

Still, it had the second lowest request for a tuition hike.

With its proposal, UVU would collect $2.3 million, which President Astrid Tuminez said will fund compensation matches, promotions and insurance all impacted by that growth. That includes, for example, a portion of the pay for 300 full-time faculty added over the past five years to keep up with the burgeoning student body.

The school was also one of the few to request money for mental health in tuition dollars rather than student fees. UVU is asking for $227,379 to expand its counseling services. With the money, it intends to hire two additional full-time therapists and one part-time psychiatric nurse practitioner.

“This one is critical,” Tuminez said. “Do we care enough?”

Southern Utah University

•Proposed increase: 0 percent

•Tuition cost for average in-state student: $3,003 per semester

•Increase approved last year: 1.5 percent

SUU is the only school to not request a tuition hike this year — something it has not done in 42 years.

The school has modest growth in its student population and decided to restructure to find money for staff pay, said President Scott Wyatt.

Campbell, the regent, added: “Wow. I want to congratulate you.”

Review: New ‘Dumbo’ is a feast for the eyes, but the human-focused story is harder to swallow

$
0
0

Watching Disney’s live-action adaptation of its animated classic “Dumbo,” one can truly believe an elephant can fly.

The harder trick, the one moviegoers always hope will happen and rarely does, is that director Tim Burton (“Beetlejuice,” “Sweeney Todd” and others) can stick the landing on one of his visually wondrous but narratively spotty movies.

This time, backed by a script by blockbuster maven Ehren Kruger (who has worked on three “Transformers” movies and “Scream 3”), Burton comes closer than usual to getting it right, but it’s still a mess.

Set in 1919, the story begins in the Medici Brothers Circus, a rundown collection of acts touring the country by train. (Yes, animated fans, the engine is the Casey Jr. — one of the many icons from the 1941 original.) When the tour gets to Joplin, Mo., circus kids Milly (Nico Parker) and Joe (Finley Hobbins) get a surprise at the train station: Their father, Holt (Colin Farrell), finally back from World War I, with a chest full of medals and a missing left arm.

Holt and his wife, Annie, used to be the roping-and-riding stars of the Medici circus. But while Holt was in Europe, explains gruff circus owner Max Medici (Danny DeVito), Annie died of influenza and the horses were sold off. The only job left for Holt is to tend the troupe’s elephants, including Max’s latest acquisition, Mrs. Jumbo, who’s about to have a baby.

Max hopes the baby elephant will be his new star attraction — but when he sees the newborn and his giant ears, Max fears the animal will never be circus-worthy. But Milly and Joe have faith, and they see that when the baby, dubbed Dumbo, grabs a feather, it allows him to go airborne. Soon that’s incorporated into an act, and the Medici circus is suddenly successful again.

That’s where the 1941 movie ended, but here the story is just kicking into gear. Dumbo’s flying prowess gets the attention of entertainment mogul V.A. Vandevere (Michael Keaton), who wants to buy Dumbo off of Max — or, when that fails, hire the whole circus to join his New York theme park, Dreamland. What’s more, Vandevere aims to pair Dumbo with his star trapeze artist, “queen of the heavens” Collette Marchant (Eva Green).

Burton creates some gorgeous interpretations of the animated movie’s most famous scenes, from Dumbo’s clown act to the “Pink Elephants on Parade,” while throwing in some Busby Berkeley touches in the Dreamland circus extravaganza. Burton and Kruger reference some of the original’s problematic moments — the alcohol references, or the outdated Jim Crow stereotyping — in clever and inoffensive ways. And, yes, the song “Baby Mine” (heard twice in the film, the second time covered by Arcade Fire) can still make grown men cry.

And where the 1941 version was an animal-driven story, this take is centered mainly on the humans — a tale of families, biological and manufactured, bonding together in the face of capitalist greed.

If only Burton could make all the components mesh. Farrell and the kid actors seem to be making a sensitive family drama with computer-animated elephants; Green is in a smoldering film noir; and DeVito and Alan Arkin (as Vandevere’s main investor) are doing Borscht Belt comedy. Meanwhile, Keaton — who is reuniting with Burton for the first time since “Batman Returns” (which also starred DeVito) — is off in his own villainous orbit, fun to watch but miles apart from everything else that’s going on.

For all the moments of splendor, there are also moments of idiotic excess (the biggest perhaps the cameo by boxing announcer Michael Ruffer) that undercut the magic Burton is trying to conjure. “Dumbo” gets airborne, but it’s another bumpy flight for a director whose reach so often extends his grasp.

——

★★1/2

‘Dumbo’

Disney’s animated elephant flies again, in a live-action adaptation loaded with visual delights but a clunky human-focused narrative.

  • Where • Theaters everywhere.
  • When • Friday, March 29.
  • Rated • PG for peril/action, some thematic elements, and brief mild language.
  • Running time • 112 minutes.

Police officers in Salt Lake City schools will be trained to arrest students less often

$
0
0
(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Mayor Jackie Biskupski gives a high five to Rep. Sandra Hollins after announcing a new school resource officer initiative at West High School, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)       Salt Lake City Police SRO Sgt. Phil Eslinger talks about the new school resource officer initiative at West High School, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.


(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)       Salt Lake City Mayor Jackie Biskupski announces a new school resource officer initiative at West High School, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.


(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)       Angela Doan talks about the school resource officer contract during a news conference at West High School, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)       Salt Lake City Mayor Jackie Biskupski announces a new school resource officer initiative at West High School, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.


(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)       The school resource officer contract was signed Tuesday, March 26, 2019.(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)       Salt Lake City Mayor Jackie Biskupski  signs the school resource officer contract at West High School, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)       Rep. Sandra Hollins signs the school resource officer contract at West High School, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)       Salt Lake City School District Superintendent Lexi Cunningham talks about the new school resource officer initiative at West High School, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.


(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)       Salt Lake City Police SRO Sgt. Phil Eslinger signs the school resource officer contract at West High School, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)       Rep. Sandra Hollins talks to police officers after announcing a new school resource officer initiative at West High School, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)       Salt Lake City School District Superintendent Lexi Cunningham talks about the new school resource officer initiative at West High School, Tuesday, March 26, 2019.

When the sergeant walked into a school, he would hear students whisper.

“Who’s in trouble?” they’d ask one another. “Who’s being arrested?”

And for a while, Salt Lake City police Sgt. Phil Eslinger acknowledged, they were right. Most of the times he went into a classroom, it was to pull kids out, question them and investigate them. That’s what he saw as his job to keep the schools safe. Even when he was looking into minor offenses. Even when he had to make an arrest.

Turns out, it was making things worse.

Some students dropped out. Some whom he disciplined got arrested again later in life. The number of crimes went up instead of down.

So after a year of studying those adverse effects — and in part due to a lawsuit — the officers who patrol Salt Lake City schools will now undergo more training in an effort to cut down on the number of students who are arrested.

The first interaction with a kid, Eslinger said, should rarely result in a citation; the goal should be building trust and positive relationships and, when possible, referring students to the principal.

“There is a difference between a student with a cellphone in the classroom and a student with a firearm,” Mayor Jackie Biskupski said. “Officers are in our schools to protect students — not to investigate them.”

As part of the promise to reform, representatives from the city, police department and school district signed a new agreement for security and training while standing in the hallways of one of the schools where officers have had the most trouble: West High.

The district was widely criticized after a 2010 police roundup of students there whom officers suspected of having gang affiliations. Between 14 and 40 teens — all of them black, Latino or Pacific Islander — were detained, questioned and falsely accused of being in gangs, according to a lawsuit filed by the American Civil Liberties Union.

That lawsuit ended in a settlement with a payout from police, an agreement to stop “gang sweeps” and a requirement for officers to undergo annual implicit bias training.

Even since then, the police department has continued to post more officers at schools on the west side and in areas with higher minority populations. Part of the contract is to staff officers at all middle and high schools, “not just those with certain characteristics,” said Biskupski, who has made this one of her top priorities before she leaves office.

The district will now have 11 resource officers — up from nine last year. Ten of those are armed Salt Lake City officers. One is an anti-gang educator in a youth program.

The three large public high schools in the district (East, West and Highland) will each have two officers throughout the day. The five middle schools will all have one. Previously, the two middle schools on the west side each had an officer while the three on the east side shared one, Eslinger said, and officers responded often to kids smoking or getting into fights.

Now he wants his force to play basketball with students at recess, read to them in the library and try to intervene when someone might be heading down a negative path. They should be like a counselor and a cop. And they should be there in case of a serious schoolwide threat, which occur maybe a half dozen times over the entire district in a year, Eslinger added.

The role of school resource officers has come under national scrutiny in recent years but particularly after one stationed at a Florida high school did not go inside last year when he heard gunshots. Seventeen people were killed while he waited by the door.

It touched off a debate about whether resource officers are effective or if, on a larger scale, they react too quickly to minor issues and arrest students too aggressively for crimes unrelated to possible attacks.

Zeia Woodruff is a senior at West High who sits on the executive committee for the Utah chapter of March for Our Lives, a student group urging gun reform after the deadly school shooting in Florida. She said she doesn’t want to see more officers patrolling schools but likes the softer approach this contract creates.

“We don’t want to support the militarization or more guns or more police officers pumped into schools,” Woodruff said. “There has to be relationship building. There has to be people who can talk to kids who might be causing trouble or posing a threat.”

On a national level, there are no training requirements to be a school resource officer. In Utah, after a bill passed in 2016, the state began requiring those officers to complete coursework on how to interact with students and when to intervene. The agreement in Salt Lake City adds another level of training.

“This is an important step to avoid criminalizing students,” said state Rep. Sandra Hollins, who sponsored that legislation three years ago.

As a result of that early initiative, Salt Lake City School District reported that the number of citations given to students decreased from 503 in the 2013-2014 school year to 112 in 2016-2017. Superintendent Lexi Cunningham said she’d like to see the numbers go even lower with more kids referred to peer court rather than getting a criminal record.

Cunningham said administrators should handle truancy issues and minor fights, not officers.

There are more than 23,000 students in the district, which has had Salt Lake City police patrols since the 1970s. The two agencies entered into a contract, though, only three years ago. This is the first major revision since then.

Eslinger said, over time, when he walks into a school, he hopes students will come up to him and say, “Good morning” rather than worry about why he’s there. Officers are the first line of defense and the first face many kids see walking to class every day.

“We are very dedicated to improving those relationships.”

Guv signs off, so Utah’s 3.2 beer law is on its way out. Stronger brews will be in grocery stores Nov. 1

$
0
0

After 86 years, Utah’s 3.2 beer law finally met its demise Tuesday, when Gov. Gary Herbert signed SB132, making way for higher-alcohol brews in grocery and convenience stores.

The law, which takes effect Nov. 1 in an early Christmas gift for beer lovers, boosts the state cap on retail beer from 3.2 percent to 4 percent alcohol by weight. Stronger brews will continue to be sold at liquor stores operated by the Utah Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control.

Even with the stronger beer, the Beehive State will continue to have one of the nation’s strictest alcohol limits. Currently, 18 states have caps on alcohol for beer and wine sold in grocery and convenience stores. The average limit is 12.4 percent ABV, much less restrictive than Utah.

The law also boosts the allowable alcohol content on beer served on tap — sometimes called draft beer — at restaurants and bars.

As part of the compromise, worked out on the final day of 2019 legislative session, the state will boost the tax on barrels of beer from $12.80 — already the highest in the nation — to $13.10. The additional 30 cents will be used for enforcement.

The increase will trickle down to drinkers, said Jim Olsen, president of the Utah Beer Wholesalers Association. “It always gets passed on to consumers.”

But the increase should be minimal, less than a cent per can or bottle.

A “beer availability work group,” staffed by the DABC, also was created to study issues of availability, alcohol content and retail practices during the next nine months and report findings to legislative interim committees.

Olsen said stores have seven months to figure out how to take 3.2 beer out of the store Oct. 31, so that higher alcohol beer is available Nov. 1.

Beer brewers say they also will use the next seven months to adjust recipes and get new beer labels approved and printed, a process that usually takes months.

Utah’s 3.2 law dates back 86 years. Nine months before Prohibition was officially repealed, Congress passed the Cullen-Harrison Act, which allowed the production of 3.2 percent beer. It was a major step at a time when making alcohol was not allowed. Cullen-Harrison fell away when Prohibition was repealed in late 1933, but many states, including Utah, left the law on the books.

Herbert on Tuesday signed a total of 66 bills and resolutions, including a proposal to raise the state’s minimum marriage age to 16 and require both parental consent and judicial approval for 16- and 17-year-olds to wed.

The state’s current law allows minors as young as 15 to marry if they have judicial and parental consent. Rep. Angela Romero, D-Salt Lake City, initially wanted to prohibit all underage marriages but she later agreed to change state law more gradually. She says she expects to come back in future legislative sessions to raise the marriage age again.

Other bills signed Tuesday by Herbert include:

  • <a href="https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/static/HB0179.html" target=_blank>HB179</a>, which makes it a criminal misdemeanor to illegally obstruct state or local roadways.
  • <a href="https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/static/SB0034.html" target=_blank>SB34</a>, which encourages cities to plan for affordable housing development.
  • <a href="https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/static/SB0147.html" target=_blank>SB147</a>, which requires lobbyists to complete annual courses on workplace harassment and discrimination.
  • <a href="https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/static/HB0258.html" target=_blank>HB 258</a>, which boosts the penalty for operating an escort service or other sexually oriented business without a license.
  • <a href="https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/static/SB0032.html" target=_blank>SB32</a>, which provides the option of a public defender to children at essentially all juvenile court proceedings.
  • <a href="https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/static/SB0161.html" target=_blank>SB161</a>, which makes various corrective changes to the state’s new medical cannabis act. For instance, the bill extends interim decriminalization protections to parents and legal guardians of minors who are qualified cannabis patients.
  • <a href="https://le.utah.gov/~2019/bills/static/SB0188.html" target=_blank>SB188</a>, which bars health care providers from conducting pelvic examinations on unconscious patients without their consent, except in certain listed situations.

Tribune reporter Bethany Rodgers contributed to this report.

Think you know Utah? Take our news quiz and find out.

$
0
0

Last week, 94 percent of you knew that Russia deported two missionaries from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but only 21 percent knew there are 900 calories in Crown Burger’s famous pastrami burger. Think you kept up with the news this week? Take our quiz to find out. A new one will post every Friday morning. You can find previous quizzes here. If you’re using The Salt Lake Tribune mobile app, click here.

For clarification and fact checking — but hopefully not cheating — purposes, you can find the stories referenced in each question here: Question 1, Question 2, Question 3, Question 4, Question 5, Question 6, Question 7, Question 8, Question 9, Question 10, Question 11 and Question 12.

All aboard? South Salt Lake’s newest brewery, Level Crossing, is where beer, art and music cross paths

$
0
0
(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)  Chris Detrick, head brewer for Level Crossing Brewing Co. pours one of four new beers on tap.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)  Level Crossing Brewing Co.'s team includes head brewer, Chris Detrick, left, Katie Flanagan, sales and marketing manager and Mark Medura, owner.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)  Katie Flanagan, sales and marketing manager and Mark Medura, owner, of Level Crossing Brewing Co. in South Salt Lake.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. owner Mark Medura, right, is joined by Eric Stonehill, Project Manager, Chris Detrick, head brewer and Andrew Madsen of Madcraft Sign and Fabrication Co., from left, as they get ready for a March 30 opening.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Sharing a beer in the space they created are Level Crossing Brewing Co. owner Mark Medura, left, Andrew Madsen of Madcraft Sign and Fabrication Co., Eric Stonehill, Project Manager and Chris Detrick, head brewer.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. opens March 30 with four beers on tap: You-Tah Uncommon, right, amber ale, American wheat and oat pale ale.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. is scheduled to open on March 30.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. in South Salt Lake features a 1946 Chevy Truck, purchased from Milton Farm in Sterling, Utah. The flat bed will be the stage for live music.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) A blues musician is part of the mural — by Utah artist Jann Haworth — at Level Crossing Brewing Co.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. will package its brews in aluminum cans and sell them in an on-site retail store.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)  Chris Detrick is the head brewer at Level Crossing Brewing Co., which opens March 30 at 2496 S. West Temple, South Salt Lake.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)  Chris Detrick, head brewer for Level Crossing Brewing Co., shows off the tasting room with his new office in the background.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)  Chris Detrick, head brewer at Level Crossing Brewing Co., gives a tour of the cold storage area.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)  Chris Detrick, head brewer for Level Crossing Brewing Co. in South Salt Lake.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. will open with four beers on tap, the oat pale ale, amber ale, the You-Tah Uncommon and an American wheat.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)  Chris Detrick, head brewer for Level Crossing Brewing Co. checks to see if fermentation is complete.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. features artwork by local artist Alex Gregory.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. features work by local artist Alex Gregory.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)  Chris Detrick, head brewer for Level Crossing Brewing Co. pours one of four new beers on tap.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. sits at the base of the iconic South Salt Lake water tower at 2496 S. West Temple.(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. sits at the base of the iconic South Salt Lake water tower at 2496 S. West Temple.

South Salt Lake • In train talk, a "level crossing” is where a rail line intersects with a road — rather than crossing over it by bridge or under it via a tunnel.

In Utah, though, Level Crossing soon could mean a place where beer, art and music meet.

Level Crossing Brewing Co., which opens Saturday, will be the third beer production facility in South Salt Lake, already home to SaltFire Brewing Co. and Shades Brewing (formerly Shades of Pale).

Owner Mark Medura, a former vice president for Park City’s High West Distillery, said it was a personal dream to launch his own business and be part of the state’s booming beer-making industry. “It’s the last job I hope to have.”

Level Crossing Brewery will be the second brewery to open this week in Utah. UTOG Brewing Co., 2331 Grant Ave. in Ogden, opened Thursday. That puts the state’s brewery total at 31, according to the Utah Brewers Guild, with more breweries expected.

(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co., scheduled to open on March 30, found its new home in the 10,000-square-foot space at the base of the iconic South Salt Lake water tower at 2496 S. West Temple.
(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co., scheduled to open on March 30, found its new home in the 10,000-square-foot space at the base of the iconic South Salt Lake water tower at 2496 S. West Temple. (Francisco Kjolseth/)

Medura and a crew of devoted friends spent the past year gutting and remodeling a 1980s warehouse at 2496 S. West Temple — directly underneath the South Salt Lake water tower visible from Interstate 15 — for the brewery.

The finished project includes a taproom with exposed brick, a long wooden bar with metal accents and ceiling-height windows that will give customers a view into the 15-barrel brew house.

“I wanted to bring the brewery into the taproom as much as I could,” Medura explained.

(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. in South Salt Lake features a 1946 Chevy Truck, purchased from Milton Farm in Sterling, Utah. The flatbed will be the stage for live music.
(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. in South Salt Lake features a 1946 Chevy Truck, purchased from Milton Farm in Sterling, Utah. The flatbed will be the stage for live music. (Francisco Kjolseth/)

The north wall of the taproom features a giant red, orange and yellow mural by Utah artist Jann Haworth that pays homage to blues music and to Memphis’ legendary Sun Records. Connected to the art piece is a 1946 Chevrolet pickup truck, purchased from Milton Farm in Sterling, Utah. The flatbed of the truck will serve as a stage for live music.

For the initial opening, head brewer Chris Detrick will have four beers on tap: an amber ale, an American wheat, an oat pale ale and the “You-tah Uncommon." The latter is a local take on Kentucky common, a once-popular pre-Prohibition beer that is slightly sweet with roasted malt and corn malt flavors.

(Francisco Kjolseth  |  The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. opens March 30 with four beers on tap: You-Tah Uncommon, right, amber ale, American wheat and oat pale ale.
(Francisco Kjolseth | The Salt Lake Tribune) Level Crossing Brewing Co. opens March 30 with four beers on tap: You-Tah Uncommon, right, amber ale, American wheat and oat pale ale. (Francisco Kjolseth/)

Detrick, who has more brews in the works, said the canning line should be up and running soon. Customers will be able to buy beer and other merchandise at the brewery’s on-site retail outlet. Brewery tours also are planned.

A wood-fired oven for pizza and sandwiches also is on its way.

Detrick, former photojournalist for The Salt Lake Tribune, is well-known in Utah’s home-brewing circles, having won numerous state and national awards. His Double Rye IPA, which won a first in the Beehive Brew-Off, was one of the first collaboration beers produced with Uinta Brewing Co. under its Cahoots label. Detrick also worked with Epic Brewing Co. on a Jack Mormon Coffee Stout.

During a recent open house, South Salt Lake Mayor Cherie Wood said Level Crossing fits the city’s vision of a “creative zone” — a destination spot for residents as well as those living outside the city. Whether they’re painting murals or brewing beer, she said, “we really wanted to foster artists who create in their own unique way.”

To help push the redevelopment, the South Salt Lake City Council repealed a series of old, restrictive liquor laws in 2017 in hopes of attracting more breweries, distilleries and wineries.

The most significant change was eliminating the quota for breweries within city limits. Previously, South Salt Lake allowed only one for every 10,000 residents. The city also removed its five-barrel production minimum, which prevented smaller brewers from starting up.

Medura said all those factors made the city an attractive location for Level Crossing. As for the brewery’s name, he was drawn to it because he had a level crossing in his backyard while growing up. It became a meeting spot for he and his friends.

This brewery, he hopes, will become a similar place, where beer lovers can gather with friends and feel welcome.

From blue pee to pink cubicles, fake mission calls to phony notices — April Fools Day is coming. It’s time to prank or be pranked.

$
0
0

April First looms — the day for pranking and punking, fooling and feigning, hexing and vexing, hijinks and low jinks.

Some hoaxes are simple. One perpetrator, one victim. A costumed wife flashes her unsuspecting husband. A fiancee bakes an unforgettable, impenetrable, inedible cake.

Others are elaborate, costly conspiracies. Families, friends, co-workers, even hired hands plot against an unwitting target. A man’s man comes back from vacation to a pinkalicious office. A couple return home only to find a wall where their door once was.

We asked readers to share their best capers. Maybe they’ll inspire you or maybe they’ll remind you to beware come Monday (or, for that matter, any other day, heh-heh-heh).

Apocalypse now • “I tagged my friends’ house in Sandy with spray-painted giant words ‘THE END IS NEAR’ because we knew they were replacing their siding the next week. They had people texting and knocking on their door, freaked out. Even better was that they lived off a bigger street, and it was the week of the blood moon in September 2015, [doomsayer and prepper] Julie Rowe was at her peak, and the [LDS] church had just released the statement to avoid end-of-days movements. My favorite prank of all time.”

— Jacquelynn Sokol, Sandy

School daze • “When I was a student at Davis High, I worked one class period for the attendance secretary. When the school office updated its stationery, I kept a stack of letterhead and envelopes. Years after graduation, I drafted a letter to several high school friends, advising them that they had failed to complete one mandatory credit from high school and that their diplomas were invalid — they would have to come back to high school and finish the class. Mailed them out from the correct city of origin, signed by a made-up administrator of the school — sat back and thoroughly enjoyed the ensuing freak show. (It usually only took a day or so for the recipient to determine the letter was a fake.)”

— Traci Gundersen, Draper

Smelly delivery • “As a teenage worker at a Jack in the Box in Auburn, Calif., a co-worker used to crouch down below me unseen at the drive-thru window and make authentic fart sounds — timed exactly as I stretched out the window to deliver the orders to the cars. I actually married the prankster a few years after, and the marriage has lasted.”

— Jill Taylor, Hawaii

A bevy of buyers • “I asked people on Facebook to call or text brother-in-law Joe that you read his ad on Craigslist for a used lawn mower. He received hundreds of text messages from people he didn’t know wanting the lawn mower.”

— Solomon Sampson, Mesa, Ariz.

Scary trophy • “My neighbors in college used fishing line to tie our shower door shut and pack it full of leaves. We used a blanket to scoop leaves out, drag them to a window and dump them outside. As we got to the bottom of the leaves, we discovered a deer head from their recent hunting trip.”

— Alice Fisher Roberts, Salt Lake City

Urinetown • “I bought some methylene blue solution from a pet store (labeled use is to treat fish ich) and baked it into a batch of brownies, which I brought to a [Latter-day Saint] Young Single Adult linger longer potluck. Everyone who partook ended up having a bold blue color to their next, er, No. 1 bathroom event.”

— David Outhier, Anaheim, Calif.

Ask what you can do for your ... • “In 1962, while living in California, our parents woke us kids up early on a Sunday morning for a family meeting. They said the newspaper reported that President John F. Kennedy had announced he was making Peace Corps opportunities available to families. They felt we as a family should volunteer. They didn’t know the specific assignment yet, but we would likely be moving overseas in the next month. We were stunned. They then said they would fix us breakfast while we read the article in the paper. They handed the paper to us. Across the front page in bold marker was written ‘April Fools!’ I was relieved but also a little disappointed.”

— Mark Steele, Cedar Hills

Better late than ... wait • “For April Fools’ Day one year, I turned all the clocks ahead one hour. I even turned my husband’s watch ahead. His friend was in on the joke. He picked him up a little ‘late’ for work. Jim was really sweating it. He hates being late. As he was chafing about his tardiness, his friend had him look at a work clock. All day long my husband’s co-workers asked him to check the time.”

— Liz Vail Ashworth, Salt Lake City

Called to serve • “We created a fake [Latter-day Saint] mission call for my husband’s brother. It was complete with a letter from [then-church] President Gordon Hinckley and a mission president. The mission president letter was over-the-top hilarious. The envelope was stamped at the post office and all. We actually were worried because the family did not suspect anything.”

— Jeni Lawrence Colarusso, Salt Lake City

Discriminating taste • “My husband was always commenting on how disgusting it was to eat raw dough, like cookie dough or cake batter. For April Fools’ Day one year, I mixed two packages of chocolate cake batter, put them in a pretty glass bowl, topping the mixture with whipped cream. My husband finished off his bowl and asked for more.”

— Christine Wallace Balderas, Millcreek

Great wall • “My father, Ross Ekins, and his friend, Bill Partridge, living in Salt Lake City, engaged in a long series of pranking one another, but it all came to an end when my father administered the coup de grace. While Bill and his wife were out of town, Ross hired masons to brick up Bill’s front door. It was a brick house, so it was a fairly easy thing to lay in the same color of brick across the porch, effectively making the door disappear. Of course, Ross had the masons insert shims along each side of the big, beautiful wall so it could easily be pulled down later. We just wish they had spy cameras back in those days so we could all enjoy the looks of bewilderment when Bill and Jeanette returned late at night only to find their door had disappeared. As Bill told the story later, he had his front-door key in hand as they groped around in the semi-dark, trying desperately to find the door. Realizing that their mutual pranks had now escalated to an unsustainable level (this was NOT inexpensive) and that it would be unlikely either would ever be able to top the Great Wall of Salt Lake City, both pranksters declared a truce that was never, to my knowledge, violated.

— Roger Ekins, Jacksonville, Ore.

Door approach • One Halloween night, when our small children were asleep, I snuck out the back door in a trench coat and mask. I had nothing on under the coat. I went around to the front door and rang the doorbell. My husband opened the door expecting a trick-or-treater. In a disguised voice, I said ‘trick or treat’ — and flung open my coat. He was so shocked! When he finally got his wits about him, he grabbed my arm and pulled me into the house. A good Halloween night ending.

— Anonymous, Salt Lake City

Class act • “While I was a middle school teacher in Arlington, Va., I prepared for weeks to play a prank on my students by pretending to be a substitute teacher in my own class. I changed my hair, got glasses, bought new clothes, adopted new mannerisms and pulled it off. All my students thought I was ‘Mr. Johnson,’ who I told them would be substituting. The joke only fell apart when the school office called to say that there were reports of a substitute in my class but that I hadn’t called in sick, so the principal wanted to know what happened.”

— David Bennett, Concord, Calif.

Groundhog day • “We hid about 100 pictures of groundhogs in and on a co-worker’s desk after he got a voice-over gig as a groundhog in some cartoon. He was such an easy mark.”

— Manny Mellor, Lehi

Sisterly love • “I called my sister-in-law on the phone and told her I was from the water company, and there had been a break in the waterline a couple of blocks from her home, and I was calling just to let her know so that she could save water for her use, to fill bottles, pitchers, bathtub, etc. I also told her I was running behind in my calling because everyone had so many questions and would she mind contacting the neighbors on each side of her home and let them know the situation. She said she would but also said she wasn’t working today so she said she would cover both sides of her street for two blocks and let all of the neighbors know. Yup, she did it!”

— Gale R. Frandsen, Salt Lake City

Meet the in-laws • “When I was engaged to my husband, we had dinner at his mom’s house with some of his siblings and their spouses. I offered to bring my ‘famous sponge cake’ for dessert. My soon-to-be husband was having a hard time trying to cut the cake because it was so rubbery. He was trying hard not to embarrass me in front of his family, but it was obvious that I had baked a bad cake. When he finally got one slice cut open, he realized that it was a chocolate-frosted foam rubber sponge.”

— Valerie Phillips, Kaysville

Bat girl • “I placed a very lifelike bat on a co-worker’s keyboard, during a time when we were having a bat infestation in our downtown offices. Her scream could be heard for miles.”

— Judy Swenson Cullen, Salt Lake City

Pretty in pink • “I worked with a manly guy who made a HUGE deal about hating pink. He went on vacation and came back to a totally pinked-out cubicle. We all wore pink shirts to work that day. My favorite was the pink chair cover.”

— Kathy Cushman, Payson

P.R. blitz • “During my first month doing P.R. for a new Bay Area company, a co-worker approached me to say she had told one of our brand managers that the carpet tiles were made from recycled human hair. Now she really wanted to ‘sell’ the prank. So, I created a website for a fake company that manufactured the tiles, including multiple pages outlining the process and talking about different tile types. Then, I made up a fake P.R. person and an email for her. Naturally her email signature included the website for the carpet tile company. I emailed the brand manager at my company as the fake P.R. woman, telling him that a magazine within the ‘green building space’ was working on a piece about our tiles and that we wanted to have a quote from him about what he thought of the tiles in his office. We emailed back and forth a couple of times — not just him and the fake P.R. person, but also me, the real P.R. person. It was a hilarious chain.”

— Lindsey Nikola, Salt Lake City


Utah lawmakers tucked away $110M to solve a slew of building and parking problems on Capitol Hill and its surroundings

$
0
0

Utah’s first state flag, pioneer wedding dresses and other treasures from the state’s past are currently stored in a dank basement surrounded by a network of leaky pipes.

A couple miles away at the state offices on Capitol Hill, the air conditioning and heating systems and bathroom fixtures are closing in on the end of their useful lives. And the parking shortage around the statehouse complex is so acute that visitors are often forced to park their cars a half-mile away or farther and pick their way along the road’s shoulder to get to the building.

But state officials say they think they can solve all of those problems together, and in the past legislative session, they set aside $110 million for a multiyear project to do it.

“We had all these individual requests for buildings ... and we said, ‘Let’s have this bigger conversation,’” House Speaker Brad Wilson, R-Kaysville, said in an interview the final day of the legislative session.

Wilson touched on the project in his speech to open the 2019 session, explaining that the effort could replace aging and inadequate structures while simultaneously creating a more welcoming space for visitors to the Capitol grounds.

The first step will be crafting a long-term plan to address space constraints for the state’s Agriculture Department, Department of Heritage and Arts and agencies based on Capitol Hill.

Allyson Gamble, executive director of the Capitol Preservation Board, said her organization and representatives from the executive and legislative branches will work together to develop this strategy. They’re working to set a date for their first meeting on the subject and are authorized by a state spending bill to spend up to $250,000 on the planning effort.

Part of the analysis will look at relocating agencies from the 60-year-old State Office Building — which sits just north of the Capitol — to sites closer to mass transit and more accessible to employees.

“There’re lots of needs from the tenants on Capitol Hill to try to accommodate their growth,” Gamble said.

Moving state employees to a new home would ease the demands on Capitol Hill, so officials could replace the aging office building with a smaller, more energy-efficient structure that could hold state art and history collections.

The Utah Department of Heritage and Arts has been pushing to relocate its arts and artifacts collection, which is now tucked away in the Rio Grande Depot and the Art Haus.

“The collection faces daily threats because of inadequate environmental controls and deteriorated building systems,” stated a recent report by the Utah State Building Board.

Glass tubes created by Philo Farnsworth in his early television developments, pioneer wedding dresses and a framed lock of Brigham Young’s hair are among the artifacts stored in the Rio Grande Depot basement. The department’s spokesman, Josh Loftin, said the collection valued at roughly $100 million is largely off-limits to the public in its current location, although state historians do try to display the precious items in museums across the state.

“We need a facility that’s built specifically for this, for the preservation and storage of all these materials, and that includes high-level climate controls, it includes state-of-the-art shelving ... and it includes space for people to research and catalogue,” he said.

(Jeremy Harmon  |  Tribune file photo) Utah's first flag sits on a work table in the basement at the Rio Grande Depot, home of the Utah state historical offices, on Feb. 15, 2018. Archivists are concerned about the current storage facility and the potential for serious damage from water to the collection of artifacts and documents it houses.
(Jeremy Harmon | Tribune file photo) Utah's first flag sits on a work table in the basement at the Rio Grande Depot, home of the Utah state historical offices, on Feb. 15, 2018. Archivists are concerned about the current storage facility and the potential for serious damage from water to the collection of artifacts and documents it houses.

The department has considered building a facility on the Art Haus property and has also looked at the current location of The Road Home homeless shelter, which is slated for closure later this year.

The building board before the 2019 session recommended a roughly $36 million project for a new artifacts and arts facility and also requested $28 million for a replacement state agriculture building that would have labs, private offices and spaces to interact with the public. The department’s current headquarters “was not designed to recognize this range of needs” and is strained by the agency’s overall growth, according to the report.

Both of these needs will now be studied as part of the overall review of state facilities on Capitol Hill and its surroundings, according to the Legislature’s spending bill. The cramped parking situation around the Capitol complex will also be included.

Surface lots and underground parking provide about 1,100 spaces on Capitol Hill, and the preservation board several months ago approved a plan to build a parking structure that would add 300 spots in place of an upper lot, Gamble has said. The board could, alternatively, consider putting those additional spaces below-ground near the state Office Building.

Gamble said the $110 million allocated this year by the Legislature will only be the first funding installment for the sprawling building project.

It was only about a decade ago that the state wrapped up its massive, $227 million project to restore the Utah Capitol building and shore it up against earthquakes, as well as remodeling committee rooms and adding security enhancements.

Background checks? Culture shift? Some therapists, members argue Latter-day Saints need to do more to vet their leaders.

$
0
0

Knowing what he knows now, Richard Ostler said he would have taken a more involved role in his children’s upbringing within The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.

Ostler, who is now 58, said that 20 years ago, when he had six children at home, he didn’t meddle much in their interactions with church leaders as they grew older and started having one-on-one conversations with bishops as part of so-called worthiness interviews. Ostler said he didn’t ask any questions about those meetings because it never occurred to him that he should. He trusted his church leaders and his children never said anything was amiss.

Now, he said, “instead of sort of just saying, ‘That’s the church’s job, I’m not involved in that process.’ I would, 20 years later, even though I didn’t have any firsthand negative experience ... I would take a different, proactive role.”

Ostler said he would have asked leaders in advance what questions they would be asking his children, and make sure that he agreed with them. Then, he said, he would have gone over the questions with the kids beforehand, using the review as a teaching moment.

A former bishop himself, Ostler said the #MeToo movement and news about sexual victimization by bishops and other church leaders have shown him there is more the faith could do to keep its congregants, especially women and children, safe. Part of that, he and other Latter-day Saints say, is making sure these lay leaders have backgrounds that are appropriate for the positions they fill.

(Rick Egan  |  The Salt Lake Tribune)

Former Latter-day Saint bishop Richard Ostler. Friday, Oct. 28, 2016.
(Rick Egan | The Salt Lake Tribune) Former Latter-day Saint bishop Richard Ostler. Friday, Oct. 28, 2016. (Rick Egan/)

Like the Catholic Church did in 2002 in response to The Boston Globe’s reporting on widespread allegations of child sex abuse by clergy, some members say the least the LDS Church can do is require formal criminal backgrounds checks of its leaders and anyone who works with children.

So far, the LDS Church — with its all-male priesthood — doesn’t widely require members to undergo such checks. Even if it did, therapists say, the checks wouldn’t fix or prevent all problems.

The practice of not reporting, of trying to sort out abuse allegations within the church, must also change, said April Carlson, a Salt Lake City-based therapist and social worker.

“It’s just this culture of protecting perpetrators and where women just don’t have a voice,” she said. “... We don’t tell stories about women in our classes and our lessons. Women aren’t on the podium leading. Women don’t have any real power, and it makes it really difficult to catch perpetrators.”

According to the church’s website, members considered for positions working with children or youths are recommended by adult leaders. Candidates are interviewed and leaders check their membership records, which would note if they ever were “involved in abusive behavior.”

“If there is any indication of that person being involved in abusive behavior,” the policy states, “that person is disqualified from serving in any capacity with children or youth.”

As for prospective bishops, they are recommended by local leaders to the faith’s governing First Presidency.

First, though, these local leaders “conduct a thorough interview and review church records to ensure there is no known record or concern of church discipline or annotation for serious moral misconduct,” church spokesman Eric Hawkins explained in an email. “They also rely on their personal experience with the individual and their judgment of his character.”

Depending on how long a person has been in the church and whether leaders were made aware of any abuse allegations, a review of the membership record might not reveal, for example, a former conviction for child sexual abuse.

Background checks, Carlson said, would be a way for the church to weed out those individuals, the most egregious sexual predators.

In addition, background checks are a standard requirement for many jobs, especially in industries that involve children, said Montana-based therapist and Latter-day Saint Sara Hughes-Zabawa.

“My local gym takes more safety precautions than my congregation,” she said. “That’s a problem.”

No ‘end-all, be-all’

In some places, such as Australia and Pennsylvania, where the law mandates background checks for volunteers working with kids, the church reimburses members for these reviews.

Akash Jayaprakash, who has served as executive secretary and a primary teacher in his Philadelphia ward, or congregation, said inconvenience was the only downside to getting his background checks, two of which he could do online and one that required his fingerprints.

While he said he’s never personally dealt with abuse within the church in other wards where background checks aren’t required, “I certainly feel better in Pennsylvania with this done.”

He believes it’s something all Latter-day Saint churches should do.

Hughes-Zabawa said that while background checks aren’t the “end-all, be-all” to protect congregants, they are a “safety mechanism.”

“It’s one of those tools that prevents individuals who are looking to abuse in settings that are easy to do,” she said, “and [it] also creates an accountability structure.”

To adequately address sexual victimization within the church, she said, and to ensure that leaders are vetted and safe, a few other things need to happen, too.

First, children should never be alone with one adult, which is already a church rule but members say it isn’t always strictly enforced. Second, Latter-day Saint leaders should be trained to report allegations of abuse to law enforcement because background checks don’t work if accusations never leave the church.

According to church guidelines introduced in March 2018, two adults must be present during all youth activities and in classrooms. The church has also added windows to all classrooms in chapels and meetinghouses — but not bishop’s offices — built after 2006.

Updated guidelines now allow for youths or women to have another adult in the room during interviews. Short of that, a parent or another adult must at least be nearby in an adjoining room during these one-on-one meetings.

Lay leaders also are instructed to “never disregard a report of abuse or counsel a member not to report criminal activity to law enforcement personnel.”

Church leaders and members also are told to fulfill all legal obligations to report abuse to civil authorities. Leaders are advised to call a church help line to discuss the allegations with legal counsel to make sure they are meeting reporting requirements.

“Any church leader who learns of or suspects abuse is instructed to call the help line immediately,” Hawkins said. “They will be provided with direction and assistance to stop the abuse, help the victim and ensure all necessary reporting is complete.”

‘Call the police’

Carlson, who has previously investigated child sexual abuse cases with the Department of Children and Family Services in Los Angeles, said she’s seen cases in the past when church leaders hid abuse and discouraged victims from reporting to law enforcement.

As a Latter-day Saint with pioneer ancestry, Carlson said she sees at least one explanation for this hesitancy to involve police.

“Mormons were ... a polygamist people and threatened by law enforcement for practicing sexuality in the way that we believed we should practice sexuality,” she said. “ … There’s a culture of not trusting law enforcement and hiding things from the government and handling things in-house.”

In an Exponent II blog post she wrote a year ago, while “super angry and frustrated,” she equated abuse reports with other public safety emergencies.

“When your neighbor is experiencing cardiac arrest,” she wrote, “do you call the bishop?” or “When your house is on fire, do you call the bishop?”

No, you call the appropriate emergency responders, in this case paramedics or the fire department, she said, adding the same is true when ones needs to report domestic violence or sexual abuse.

“Call the police!” she wrote.

Looking back at his own calling to be a bishop of a Latter-day Saint singles ward in Magna, Ostler said he didn’t recall a necessarily thorough vetting process, although he trusted leaders did their due diligence in assigning him.

He noted he never had spoken before with the stake president who called him up for an exploratory interview. After that “in-depth” meeting, the stake president, who oversaw a number of Young Single Adult congregations, went to the Ostler home and invited him to serve.

“He didn’t ask me any background. He didn’t ask me if I’d been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor to do any sort of criminal background [check],” Ostler said. “He just asked me if I was worthy of my temple recommend and extended the call.”

It’s difficult, he said, because there are some people background checks wouldn’t have caught, who either hadn’t started abusing yet or who had never been criminally investigated.

On the other hand, Ostler said, he hopes the church is doing what it can to find out that information, “so everybody’s making an informed decision on a potential leader.”

Scott D. Pierce: It’s harder to make ‘Veep’ seem crazy with Trump in the White House

$
0
0

When “Veep” premiered in 2012, it was easier to make a show about an incompetent, ridiculous, profane, selfish, self-involved misanthrope who was a heartbeat away from the presidency — and make it seem like comedy.

Seven years later, executive producer/star Julia Louis-Dreyfus and showrunner David Mandel both say it’s gotten harder to seem outrageous.

“Given our current political climate, it’s been more challenging for us to sort of push boundaries,” Louis-Dreyfus said. She thinks what happens in the real world is often “too extreme for our show.”

“You go back eight years ago ... and it was like, ‘Yay! Obama’s in the White House. We’ve beaten racism,’” Mandel said. “And now I’m the only one without a blackface photo on his yearbook page. ... Sometimes it feels like they’re another show and that they’re kind of stealing from us.”

The central character in “Veep,” Selina Meyer (Louis-Dreyfus), hasn’t been caught with a blackface photo in her past, but she’s had more than her share of missteps. She’s a former U.S. senator whose presidential campaign failed, forcing her to accept the powerless position of vice president — and the humiliation of irrelevance.

Selina launched another run for the White House and suddenly become president (for eight months) when her predecessor resigned ... only to end up in an electoral college tie and then out on her ear when the vote went to Congress. At every step, she’s been overmatched, unprepared, ill-served by her staff and embarrassed.

Some have pegged Selina as a Republican or Democrat, but “Veep” has never identified her political party. Louis-Dreyfus attributes some of the show’s success to that, and to the fact that it exists in “an alternate universe” where no real politicians reside.

“It kind of invites everyone to the party,” she said. “In a way, it’s more apt than it ever has been, given the current insanity that we’re all living in.”

If you hadn’t already figured it out, Louis-Dreyfus is not a fan of Donald Trump, who she called a “pretend president.”

“I am a patriot, and I’m very unhappy with our current political situation,” she said, making it clear she was speaking for herself, not the show. “I have no idea who I’m going to support in 2020, except to say that it will be a Democrat, and that’s for g--damn sure.”

But both Louis-Dreyfus and Mandel caution against trying to draw close parallels between “Veep,” Trump or any other real-life politicians. When it seems like the show is reflecting the news, it’s often the other way around.

David Mandel, center, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, foreground right, and the cast and crew from “Veep” winners of the award for outstanding comedy series pose in the press room at the 68th Primetime Emmy Awards on Sunday, Sept. 18, 2016, at the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles. (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP)
David Mandel, center, Julia Louis-Dreyfus, foreground right, and the cast and crew from “Veep” winners of the award for outstanding comedy series pose in the press room at the 68th Primetime Emmy Awards on Sunday, Sept. 18, 2016, at the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles. (Photo by Jordan Strauss/Invision/AP) (Jordan Strauss/)

“We kind of touch on things that then sort of happened or are happening purely by coincidence,” Louis-Dreyfus said, including an upcoming plotline about vaccinations.

“Obviously, we didn’t write that thinking that everyone in Washington state is going to die of measles, but that may happen by Monday,” Mandel said. “So that’s ‘Veep.’”

And Mandel said that some viewers fall into a “slight trap” of “assuming that somebody is Trump and somebody is Hillary. And that’s a good thing for us because it means we get to always surprise you.”

And they’re promising more surprises in the final, seven-episode season, which begins Sunday at 10:30 p.m. on HBO.

“I can only tell you they’re crazy, jam-packed episodes,” Mandel said.

Louis-Dreyfus said she’s “very happy about” how the show ends, “And I think it’ll surprise viewers, too.”

“I think it’s the right ending for America,” Mandel deadpanned.

Letter: Herbert is wrong to want to roll back roadless rules

$
0
0

Our outdoor experiences shape the way we live our lives. Working in the outdoor industry, I am privy to the opportunities to explore Utah’s diverse terrain, which offers unparalleled adventures. Unfortunately, Utah leaders continue to attempt to weaken protections that not only impact our recreation, but also our livelihood.

One of the latest threats is Gov. Gary Herbert’s attempt to roll back protections for Inventoried Roadless Areas under the 2001 Roadless Rule, which prohibits timber harvesting and road development to safeguard natural resources.

IRAs exist in Utah’s five national forests that span a diversity of landscapes and ecosystems pivotal to our recreation and water resources. While Herbert touts wildfire mitigation needs for the rollback, science does not support his claims.

Between 2000 and 2015, less than 10 percent of fires originated in roadless areas, and 90 percent of all burned area in Utah occurred outside IRAs. So, the governor’s argument that adding infrastructure to these areas would improve fire prevention is simply not true. In fact, altering the protections for Utah’s roadless areas could potentially increase our forests susceptibility to fire.

Opening up areas protected by the roadless rule for logging would change the essential character of these iconic Utah lands for future generations.

We ask that the governor consider less impactful alternatives for fire safety, such as initiatives to make communities more prepared for fire or to support funding for federal wildfire mitigation programs. We ask that the USDA reject Utah’s proposal to petition the 2001 Roadless Rule for Utah’s 4 million acres of IRAs.

Kiko Sweeney, Salt Lake City

Submit a letter to the editor

An RSL player is speaking up on a worldwide issue — racism in soccer

$
0
0

Nedum Onuoha was in studio to analyze a duel between two of the world’s most-recognizable clubs, but once again, racist taunts spilled from the stands onto the field, making soccer become secondary. Now a center back for Real Salt Lake, who does some commentary work for BBC Sport in the offseason, Onuoha immediately noticed the body language between the player and fans during this exchange and he assumed the worst. His intuition proved right.

The taunts from a small group of Chelsea fans at Chelsea’s Stamford Bridge stadium in early December were targeted toward a budding young star of the sport, Manchester City’s Raheem Sterling.

Onuoha grew up in Manchester. It’s where his family relocated from Nigeria when he was 5, where his family’s car windows would get smashed in not at-random, where he’d eventually endure his first of many bouts with systemic racism. So when he saw the interaction between Sterling and the Chelsea fans, Onuoha figured that invisible line wasn’t just crossed, it was trampled over yet again.

What ensued was typical: the clubs investigate, police investigate, a conclusion is reached, there is usually some type of formal punishment or bans, and fans await the next whistle to be blown.

Sterling, however, refused to let it slide. He took to Instagram that following Monday to discuss racism in soccer in England, about how black athletes are portrayed in the media and how, when so many refuse to step into the spotlight and keep the conversation moving ahead, he was going to be the one who let the world know there is still so much hate and the game provides a direct pipeline for it to be voiced in front of tens of thousands.

View this post on Instagram

Good morning I just want to say , I am not normally the person to talk a lot but when I think I need my point to heard I will speak up. Regarding what was said at the Chelsea game as you can see by my reaction I just had to laugh because I don’t expect no better. For example you have two young players starting out there careers both play for the same team, both have done the right thing. Which is buy a new house for there mothers who have put in a lot of time and love into helping them get where they are, but look how the news papers get there message across for the young black player and then for the young white payer. I think this in unacceptable both innocent have not done a thing wrong but just by the way it has been worded. This young black kid is looked at in a bad light. Which helps fuel racism an aggressive behaviour, so for all the news papers that don’t understand why people are racist in this day and age all i have to say is have a second thought about fair publicity an give all players an equal chance.

A post shared by Raheem Sterling x 😇 (@sterling7) on

Onuoha came up in Manchester City’s academy system and went on to star for his hometown club, now considered one of soccer’s most influential worldwide. The 32-year-old recounts, though, how swiftly the headlines shifted in the wake of this latest incident. Sterling’s brave social media post was swept aside by Champions League headlines featuring a big Liverpool win, then Manchester United canned coach Jose Mourinho. A serious story surrounding a face of England’s national team for years to come was relegated to the depths.

“Being in the minority in some ways, you almost have to try and find a way to have some people in the majority to try and empathize, so the majority doesn’t become such a big majority anymore where your views are just completely disregarded for the sake of everyone else,” Onuoha said. “Your life matters.”

Just this week, Sterling had to put his arm around 18-year-old Callum Hudson-Odoi after the Chelsea teenager experienced blatant racist taunts in England’s 5-1 Euro 2020 qualifying win at Montenegro. Fans made monkey chants at the black English players.

England's Raheem Sterling celebrates scoring his side's fifth goal during the Euro 2020 group A qualifying soccer match between Montenegro and England at the City Stadium in Podgorica, Montenegro, Monday, March 25, 2019. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic)
England's Raheem Sterling celebrates scoring his side's fifth goal during the Euro 2020 group A qualifying soccer match between Montenegro and England at the City Stadium in Podgorica, Montenegro, Monday, March 25, 2019. (AP Photo/Darko Vojinovic) (Darko Vojinovic/)

“It’s 2019,” Sterling said afterward. “I keep saying it, and it’s a shame to see this keeps going on. We can only bring awareness and light to the situation.”

Sterling cupped his ears, smiled and stared back, letting those chanting know he would not be rattled. The photo of Sterling standing defiantly was front page on sports section back in England.

A needed wake-up call

At 13 and on tour with Manchester City’s academy in Switzerland, Onuoha had fans hurling the N-word at him in a largely empty stadium. His earliest recollection of these racist taunts came when he was 11 on a school trip to Austria. When he was playing with the England U-21s, Serbian fans began making monkey sounds. It started with a cluster of 20 or so, then upped to 100, and suddenly he estimates as many as 500 fans were hollering in unison.

It wasn’t just on the soccer field.

In the early 2000s, he couldn’t walk into a convenience store without being tailed by a store employee, assuming he might be a threat to shoplift. People would move to the other side of the street if they saw him walking with a hood on, even in the pelting Manchester rain. It’s what he details as subconscious racism.

“That’s not me,” Onuoha said. “The reason they do that, they’re not thinking this guy is going to take something, they’ve been told by their boss. For some people, it’s not a conscious thought.”

He’s telling his story because this is commonplace overseas, and like Sterling, he knows the only way to enact any sort of change is to confront this behavior. The intensity of fandom is, well, different in MLS. Onuoha chuckles re-telling a story of RSL fans applauding the team after a 4-1 home loss last season. In England, he explains, the only fans left in a home stadium in that scenario would be there simply to boo you.

Jonathan Liew, a chief sports writer at The Independent in the U.K., has penned columns on the ongoing issue of racism in soccer. Even with more incidents popping up throughout the world, it doesn’t mean there’s a rise in bigotry — Liew raises the reality that there is more surveillance at matches and the mediums to share information are more prevalent now than ever.

But it’s also how some players are portrayed consistently in the media that may shape the views of certain fans from certain clubs.

“This is an issue that goes so, so deep and so broad, I don’t think it’s limited to football, but I think it’s amplified,” Liew said. “Football creates the crucible in which these kind of emotions and these currents find voice.”

At a recent sports journalism association awards banquet, the sports editor at The Daily Mail accepted an award for outstanding coverage. During the speech, he referenced Sterling standing up to wrongs and admitted that much of the English sports media haven’t covered the matter of racism in sport as well as they should’ve. Onuoha elaborates on this chronic misstep: language in the press, especially when it comes to English soccer, can have such an influence on how the reader digests a topic.

Sterling’s social media post also pointed to differences in how two Manchester City players were treated differently by the media. A headline read that Phil Foden, a talented midfielder, bought a dream home for his mother. Foden is white. Conversely, his black teammate Tosin Adarabioyo, bought a house and was slammed for buying an expensive home even though he’s yet to start a league match for City. Liew said black athletes have been routinely praised for their speed or power rather than their strategy or intelligence.

“If that conversation forces someone to stop and think for a second before he writes a headline because of what he said,” Onuoha said, “then it’s a step in the right direction”

‘They say it’s changed, but here we are'

Partizan Belgrade's Brazilian player Everton Luiz, centre left, leaves the field accompanying by goalkeeper Filip Kljajic, during a Serbian championship match between Rad and Partizan, in Belgrade, Serbia, Sunday, Feb. 19, 2017. Luiz was in tears after suffering persistent racist chants during his team's 1-0 victory against Rad in the Serbian premiership. The Brazilian, who joined Partizan from the Swiss league in 2016, received monkey chants and other abuse, including a racist banner on the stands where Rad fans were standing. (AP Photo/Miroslav Todorovic)
Partizan Belgrade's Brazilian player Everton Luiz, centre left, leaves the field accompanying by goalkeeper Filip Kljajic, during a Serbian championship match between Rad and Partizan, in Belgrade, Serbia, Sunday, Feb. 19, 2017. Luiz was in tears after suffering persistent racist chants during his team's 1-0 victory against Rad in the Serbian premiership. The Brazilian, who joined Partizan from the Swiss league in 2016, received monkey chants and other abuse, including a racist banner on the stands where Rad fans were standing. (AP Photo/Miroslav Todorovic) (Miroslav Todorovic/)

The hatred spewed at Everton Luiz cut deep, and once the referee signaled the end of the match, he could no longer keep it buried within. His eyes welled up and the tears flow, because for 90 minutes, he heard things he’d never heard before: the monkey chants, the racist epithets, such vile extremes that the Brazilian midfielder responded by flashing a middle finger to the FK Rad fan base. Luiz, now a midfielder at RSL, was playing for Partizan Belgrade in Serbia when the March 2017 incident happened.

Wire photos of Luiz crying went viral in the soccer world. And to add to the ridiculousness of it all, Luiz was fined for his hand gesture. Like Onuoha, Luiz reiterated: once it happens to somebody, it’s talked about and in a matter of days, it’s soon forgotten by the larger soccer world.

“Then the next time it happens, it’s talked about and forgotten again,” Luiz said through a translator. “It’s just a cycle.”

Liew, the sports journalist, believes the advent of social media has provided safe spaces for racist factions associated with soccer clubs in various countries to swell. The slow rise of nationalism in some areas might play a role in the increasing amounts of racial incidents in the sport, too. Even this year, a far-right nationalist fan group has been spotted at New York City FC matches in MLS.

“In this current age of public discourse,” Liew said, “I think what were accepted norms of objective morality have kind of broken down and tribalism often takes precedence of what used to be commonly accepted as behavioral norms.”

Onuoha holds a real belief in the younger generation. He believes there’s a better social understanding of what’s acceptable now. He wants more empathy from person to person, no matter race, gender, sexuality or background. Above all, he wants people to be educated on the differences, and realize that it’s perfectly fine to put yourself in someone else’s shoes, someone you might know nothing about.

“There are two types of people: the one who says the other person’s wrong, because they refuse to see that person’s point of view and the ones who are willing to trust in other people and their view and respect it and that it can be different,” he said.

Onuoha hadn’t heard of Luiz’s experience in Serbia, but when the information was relayed to him, his voice dropped a bit and his head hung for a few seconds.

“All the stuff that’s existed the last 200, 300, 400 years, it’s absolutely insane,” RSL’s center back said, “yet, still, here we are where, legally we’re the same, but where culturally, we’re nowhere near the same — culturally we’re sometimes in the exact same spot and we’re having the same conversation over and over and over again. They say it’s changed, but here we are.”

Viewing all 90049 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>